AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Wwdc 2019 pro stand crowd reactionreddit1/14/2024 * How fast a ranking algorithm is depends on how the indexing is done. Maybe the index can be built into the way the new internet works, like DNS or routing, so the cost is shared. If there's a shared public index, that'd make it a lot easier for people to try new ranking algorithms. Some thoughts on the problem, not intended as a complete proposal or argument: Any improved system is going to need an answer for how to do it. So it seems to me the key issue isn't ranking and indexing, it's who controls the ranking and how it's defined. Within each category, there are still going to be multiple sites. Suppose you create a browsable hierarchy of categories instead. ![]() That set might contain 10,000 sites, so you need a way to push the "best" ones to the top of the list.Įven if you go with a different model than keywords, you still need ranking. Whatever kind of site(s) you're seeking, you are starting with some information that identifies the set of sites that might be what you're looking for. The thing is, I don't think you can eliminate ranking. Hopefully based on some useful metric, but the devil is in the details on that. When you rank, you pick winners and losers. A new architecture for the web doesn't need to eliminate indexing. We're seeing a new era of true Macs again.I think it would be helpful to remember to distinguish two separate search engine concepts here: indexing and ranking. It's never been JUST about the hardware, nor JUST the OS. When Apple switched to Intel, I lost my love. I've been a Mac enthusiast since the 6100/60 -> G5. You will see me commenting now, instead of in years past because Macs are Macs again. If this is something that SHOULD be permissible (by Apple), then it simply needs to be brought up to Apple's attention and hopefully addressed sooner rather than later. Other people do things they genuinely need to (not tinkering, but attempting to accomplish a necessary goal). Some people do things, just because they can (tinkering). We're seeing a new era of true Macs again. Maybe some people actually "thought outside the box" and came up with a way to do things that really turns the conventional wisdom 180. They don't realize that not everything has to go down the same road it's always gone down. Usually it sounds like the person is just being a hater, because they think something SHOULD be a certain way. I see several people complaining about things about these new M1 Macs. ![]() I "make comments/pass judgement" based on the overall "feel" of things. But csrutil (the utility to disable SIP) it's still a well documented feature that Apple supports and having it disable other features in the OS when turned off should be avoided or (at least) documented.Ĭlick to expand.Some people do things, just because they can (tinkering). It's a great security feature, it should absolutely be enabled unless you have a very good reason to disable it. Obviously, not a lot of people need to turn if off. And cybersecurity engineers also may find it useful to turn it off sometimes. Some other things that require low-level access to the hardware usually also require this (WiFi sniffers, for example). ![]() Apple doesn't list a lot of them, but notes that developing DriverKit applications may require disabling SIP. However not everything that modifies system files is malware. Malware still needs to escalate privileges to gain write access to sytem files, but there's no additional protection after that. a keylogger probably would need this kind of access to the system volume).īy disabling SIP, you remove that protection (so you fall back to the way things were before OS X 10.11). Basically, the system is now in a separate APFS volume with readonly privileges for all users, including root, so even if some malware gained root privileges it wouldn't be able to launch an attack that required modifying system files (i.e. ![]() Click to expand.System Integrity Protection.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |